<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Eight keys to a real public library consultation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Our local council who propose closing 2 libraries not only broke nearly every one of these 8 &#039;rules&#039; at their public library consultation but actually ejected a pro libraries group because they would not agree with the council&#039;s objectives. It was in fact, due to the council not including a &#039;no change&#039; option and the campaign group&#039;s objection to this that caused the council to suggest that they should not return unless they could agree with their &#039;frame of reference&#039;. Yes I will name &amp; shame - it was Milton Keynes Council!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our local council who propose closing 2 libraries not only broke nearly every one of these 8 &#8216;rules&#8217; at their public library consultation but actually ejected a pro libraries group because they would not agree with the council&#8217;s objectives. It was in fact, due to the council not including a &#8216;no change&#8217; option and the campaign group&#8217;s objection to this that caused the council to suggest that they should not return unless they could agree with their &#8216;frame of reference&#8217;. Yes I will name &#038; shame &#8211; it was Milton Keynes Council!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stevedore		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevedore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CILIP should be consultees.  They should never be involved in setting up a consultation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CILIP should be consultees.  They should never be involved in setting up a consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I will include CILIP because they are the specialist organisation for library staff and thus have experience and skills in this matter.  It is not naive nor self-interested to suggest that one checks with experts before going through with a project.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It does not, of course, mean that CILIP or anyone else should have a veto but that one should be aware of any problems with the consultation before going ahead with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If councils want to have a trouble-free unchallenged consultation, this is absolutely the way to go about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will include CILIP because they are the specialist organisation for library staff and thus have experience and skills in this matter.  It is not naive nor self-interested to suggest that one checks with experts before going through with a project.  </p>
<p>It does not, of course, mean that CILIP or anyone else should have a veto but that one should be aware of any problems with the consultation before going ahead with it.</p>
<p>If councils want to have a trouble-free unchallenged consultation, this is absolutely the way to go about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stevedore		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevedore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seriously, this is very naive, and just the sort of thing that will get you ignored.  I really would take out the comment that you should show it to trade unions (producer interest) and CILIP (the biggest producer interest in this regard) first.  Of course they should be consulted, but they are not organisations with any expertise in consultation, so cannot offer any technical advice (and nor should they - they are there to represent the interests of their members - that is their job) and in terms of the interests that they represent these should not be privileged above any others - be they users of libraries, or taxpayers/citizens who don&#039;t use libraries and can&#039;t see the point in them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What you are doing here is advocating a special place in consultation for a particular interest group with a very predictable viewpoint.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you really want to influence councils to undertake meaningful consultation then &quot;talk to CILIP first&quot; is going to remove any influence you might have.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can guess the councilss responses &quot;Why?  They know nothing about consultation, and they represent only one interest, and a producer interest at that&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I&#039;m afraid they&#039;d be right.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If library campaigners want to have influence, this is absolutely not the way to go about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, this is very naive, and just the sort of thing that will get you ignored.  I really would take out the comment that you should show it to trade unions (producer interest) and CILIP (the biggest producer interest in this regard) first.  Of course they should be consulted, but they are not organisations with any expertise in consultation, so cannot offer any technical advice (and nor should they &#8211; they are there to represent the interests of their members &#8211; that is their job) and in terms of the interests that they represent these should not be privileged above any others &#8211; be they users of libraries, or taxpayers/citizens who don&#8217;t use libraries and can&#8217;t see the point in them.</p>
<p>What you are doing here is advocating a special place in consultation for a particular interest group with a very predictable viewpoint.</p>
<p>If you really want to influence councils to undertake meaningful consultation then &#8220;talk to CILIP first&#8221; is going to remove any influence you might have.</p>
<p>I can guess the councilss responses &#8220;Why?  They know nothing about consultation, and they represent only one interest, and a producer interest at that&#8221;.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m afraid they&#8217;d be right.  </p>
<p>If library campaigners want to have influence, this is absolutely not the way to go about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments.  The post appears to have been useful in that people are sending  their own excellent suggestions either via this means or through email which I will incorporate into these points and move to a page on the site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NB. For those worried about the lack of posting over the weekend, normal service will resume soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.  The post appears to have been useful in that people are sending  their own excellent suggestions either via this means or through email which I will incorporate into these points and move to a page on the site. </p>
<p>NB. For those worried about the lack of posting over the weekend, normal service will resume soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim O'Neil		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim O'Neil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is an excellent based-on-fact doicumentary called RECLAIMING OUR TOWN (or similar) which is not about libraries but DOES show how not to hold a public consultation event! Worth seeing at least twice, as you miss nuances the first time!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an excellent based-on-fact doicumentary called RECLAIMING OUR TOWN (or similar) which is not about libraries but DOES show how not to hold a public consultation event! Worth seeing at least twice, as you miss nuances the first time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: laurensmith		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-110</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurensmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although local reps may have limited expertise relating to consultation processes, UNISON has a section working specifically on library-related issues who are able to support and advise: http://www.unison.org.uk/localgov/library.asp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although local reps may have limited expertise relating to consultation processes, UNISON has a section working specifically on library-related issues who are able to support and advise: <a href="http://www.unison.org.uk/localgov/library.asp" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.unison.org.uk/localgov/library.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NMac		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NMac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some excellent points. There is no doubt that large numbers of people feel that &quot;public consultation&quot; has become nothing more than a cynical charade by Government and Local Government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some excellent points. There is no doubt that large numbers of people feel that &#8220;public consultation&#8221; has become nothing more than a cynical charade by Government and Local Government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Council worker		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Council worker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/07/eight-keys-to-a-real-public-library-consultation.html#comment-108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why show UNISON?  they are just one of several trade unions that a council may recognise.  Why not list all the other unions?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And they will be being consulted anyway if staff are affected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And your average UNISON local rep, while being an excellent person, is not going to have any special expertise or knowledge about consultation processes so will have very little of use to say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why show UNISON?  they are just one of several trade unions that a council may recognise.  Why not list all the other unions?  </p>
<p>And they will be being consulted anyway if staff are affected.</p>
<p>And your average UNISON local rep, while being an excellent person, is not going to have any special expertise or knowledge about consultation processes so will have very little of use to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
