<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ACE consultation on libraries enters next phase while DCMS Inquiry delays results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/09/ace-consultation-on-libraries-enters-next-phase-while-dcms-inquiry-delays-results.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/09/ace-consultation-on-libraries-enters-next-phase-while-dcms-inquiry-delays-results.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: zoopla the house price judge		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/09/ace-consultation-on-libraries-enters-next-phase-while-dcms-inquiry-delays-results.html#comment-5504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zoopla the house price judge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=2398#comment-5504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[this is an outrageous survey.  It is self selecting.  It is not using a sample to get a representative view of the population as a whole.  

If this was a robust piece of research it would be a telephone questionnaire, perhaps supplemented by these mysterious workshops, done on the basis of a sample that takes account of the whole population.  It is not.  It is a survey of those who can be bothered to do the questionnaire.  By definition, almost, those already in the debate who run websites, write to the papers, etc.  

This is not research.  I repeat THIS IS NOT RESEARCH.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is an outrageous survey.  It is self selecting.  It is not using a sample to get a representative view of the population as a whole.  </p>
<p>If this was a robust piece of research it would be a telephone questionnaire, perhaps supplemented by these mysterious workshops, done on the basis of a sample that takes account of the whole population.  It is not.  It is a survey of those who can be bothered to do the questionnaire.  By definition, almost, those already in the debate who run websites, write to the papers, etc.  </p>
<p>This is not research.  I repeat THIS IS NOT RESEARCH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jodi		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/09/ace-consultation-on-libraries-enters-next-phase-while-dcms-inquiry-delays-results.html#comment-5503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jodi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=2398#comment-5503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The public should demand off line access to the consultation. It is vital that all voices are heard, especially these, as they are often the most frequent users. Shame on the Arts Council for not including ALL library users regardless of digital access.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public should demand off line access to the consultation. It is vital that all voices are heard, especially these, as they are often the most frequent users. Shame on the Arts Council for not including ALL library users regardless of digital access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
