<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Legal: Arguments	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/library-closing/legal/legal-arguments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 21:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cllr Anne Reynolds		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/library-closing/legal/legal-arguments#comment-5782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cllr Anne Reynolds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 02:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/?page_id=892#comment-5782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I sit on the scrutinising committee and by consolidating our votes with others we were able to reject the Public Consultation on Library Closures.   However, they are muttering about delegating it so it will go ahead anyway!

I had been hoping to gain some delay to give me time to scrutinise the entire (lengthy) document.  But now I may not have this luxury.

Can anyone give me any pointers e.g. the document states that anyone living
within a 30 minute bus/car ride of a library is being given an adequate provision.

So wrong on so many fronts - in our opinion - but opposing opinion is not the same as 
hard facts.   

Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sit on the scrutinising committee and by consolidating our votes with others we were able to reject the Public Consultation on Library Closures.   However, they are muttering about delegating it so it will go ahead anyway!</p>
<p>I had been hoping to gain some delay to give me time to scrutinise the entire (lengthy) document.  But now I may not have this luxury.</p>
<p>Can anyone give me any pointers e.g. the document states that anyone living<br />
within a 30 minute bus/car ride of a library is being given an adequate provision.</p>
<p>So wrong on so many fronts &#8211; in our opinion &#8211; but opposing opinion is not the same as<br />
hard facts.   </p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
