<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lewisham usage collapses	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/12/lewisham-usage-collapses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/12/lewisham-usage-collapses.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Edith		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2011/12/lewisham-usage-collapses.html#comment-191</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2011/12/lewisham-usage-collapses.html#comment-191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the Lewisham stats, I think part of the issue is very poor usage/updating of the library system by undertrained volunteers etc. I borrowed two books from the New Cross &#039;community&#039; library and after a few days they hadn&#039;t appeared on my online library account. On returning one book to the central library I asked about this - the assistant rolled their eyes and explained they&#039;d had a lot of problems at New Cross (I didn&#039;t ask about the other outsourced libraries). They&#039;re supposed to regularly sync their issues with the system but over three weeks later the other book still isn&#039;t on my record. If I wanted I could keep it. Apparently I also need to keep an eye on my account as they might sync the issue after I return the book...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m not arguing that usage hasn&#039;t dropped, but that lack of training/experience does mean the stats are likely to be far below reality. In the near future I think lost item stats for the affected libraries will make interesting reading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Lewisham stats, I think part of the issue is very poor usage/updating of the library system by undertrained volunteers etc. I borrowed two books from the New Cross &#8216;community&#8217; library and after a few days they hadn&#8217;t appeared on my online library account. On returning one book to the central library I asked about this &#8211; the assistant rolled their eyes and explained they&#8217;d had a lot of problems at New Cross (I didn&#8217;t ask about the other outsourced libraries). They&#8217;re supposed to regularly sync their issues with the system but over three weeks later the other book still isn&#8217;t on my record. If I wanted I could keep it. Apparently I also need to keep an eye on my account as they might sync the issue after I return the book&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not arguing that usage hasn&#8217;t dropped, but that lack of training/experience does mean the stats are likely to be far below reality. In the near future I think lost item stats for the affected libraries will make interesting reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
