<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More volunteers than full-time librarians by the end of 2012	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/04/more-volunteers-than-full-time-librarians-by-the-end-of-2012.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/04/more-volunteers-than-full-time-librarians-by-the-end-of-2012.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/04/more-volunteers-than-full-time-librarians-by-the-end-of-2012.html#comment-259</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2012/04/more-volunteers-than-full-time-librarians-by-the-end-of-2012.html#comment-259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I often use the most eyecatching library related quote of the day as the headline.  I thought this was the one for the current post.  The figure does indeed need taking with a pinch of salt. Posibly a boxful.  For another thing, as well as the points you mention, there are a very high number of part timers working in libraries: in ime, I am the only full-timer in 12 staff.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The headline is taken from the ecellent Booksell article above which puts it in context.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often use the most eyecatching library related quote of the day as the headline.  I thought this was the one for the current post.  The figure does indeed need taking with a pinch of salt. Posibly a boxful.  For another thing, as well as the points you mention, there are a very high number of part timers working in libraries: in ime, I am the only full-timer in 12 staff.</p>
<p>The headline is taken from the ecellent Booksell article above which puts it in context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2012/04/more-volunteers-than-full-time-librarians-by-the-end-of-2012.html#comment-258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 01:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://83.170.89.36/~publicli/2012/04/more-volunteers-than-full-time-librarians-by-the-end-of-2012.html#comment-258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The statement that very soon there will be more volunteers than staff in libraries surely needs some context. Doesn’t the CIPFA data indicate that, on average, a volunteer volunteers for &lt;br /&gt;30-35 hours a year? Thus volunteers provide around 2% of the total library work hours. I wouldn&#039;t have thought that was a disaster.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statement that very soon there will be more volunteers than staff in libraries surely needs some context. Doesn’t the CIPFA data indicate that, on average, a volunteer volunteers for <br />30-35 hours a year? Thus volunteers provide around 2% of the total library work hours. I wouldn&#8217;t have thought that was a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
