<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Special report: &#8220;Libraries of the 21st Century&#8221; versus &#8220;offering a new dress to a plague victim&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/01/special-report-libraries-of-the-21st-century-versus-offering-a-new-dress-to-a-plague-victim.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/01/special-report-libraries-of-the-21st-century-versus-offering-a-new-dress-to-a-plague-victim.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Less Naive Steve		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/01/special-report-libraries-of-the-21st-century-versus-offering-a-new-dress-to-a-plague-victim.html#comment-5646</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Less Naive Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=3975#comment-5646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Martin, let me spell it out for you.  IT CAN&#039;T BE BACKED UP WITH MORE RESOURCES.  Councils have taken a 28% reduction in their budgets.  There are more cuts to come.  That means less money for libraries.  Doing things for less? Janene Cox is dead right.  Those who deny this, in increasingly shrill voices, are sounding more and more divorced from reality every day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, let me spell it out for you.  IT CAN&#8217;T BE BACKED UP WITH MORE RESOURCES.  Councils have taken a 28% reduction in their budgets.  There are more cuts to come.  That means less money for libraries.  Doing things for less? Janene Cox is dead right.  Those who deny this, in increasingly shrill voices, are sounding more and more divorced from reality every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Cove		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/01/special-report-libraries-of-the-21st-century-versus-offering-a-new-dress-to-a-plague-victim.html#comment-5645</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Cove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=3975#comment-5645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[it has to be backed up by more resources i.e. hard cash from somewhere.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it has to be backed up by more resources i.e. hard cash from somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
