<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Newcastle 10	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html#comment-5694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=4341#comment-5694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html#comment-5693&quot;&gt;Aude&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Aude, no worries.  It was previously reported that two branches had been reprieved and so I reduced the figure, temporarily to eight;

10 libraries under threat (was 8): 10 libraries will close by 2016, with five of those possibily to be saved if taken over by volunteers.  2013/14: Cruddas Park, Denton Burn, Dinnington, Fenham, High Heaton, Jesmond and Moorside. 2015: Blakelaw, Fawdon and Newbiggin Hall will close (7/3/13).  Previously, Fenham and Cruddas Park had been removed from the under threat list (16/2/13) - link is http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2013/02/16/newcastle-s-100m-cuts-package-will-not-be-the-end-of-the-pain-61634-32820055/2/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html#comment-5693">Aude</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Aude, no worries.  It was previously reported that two branches had been reprieved and so I reduced the figure, temporarily to eight;</p>
<p>10 libraries under threat (was 8): 10 libraries will close by 2016, with five of those possibily to be saved if taken over by volunteers.  2013/14: Cruddas Park, Denton Burn, Dinnington, Fenham, High Heaton, Jesmond and Moorside. 2015: Blakelaw, Fawdon and Newbiggin Hall will close (7/3/13).  Previously, Fenham and Cruddas Park had been removed from the under threat list (16/2/13) &#8211; link is <a href="http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2013/02/16/newcastle-s-100m-cuts-package-will-not-be-the-end-of-the-pain-61634-32820055/2/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2013/02/16/newcastle-s-100m-cuts-package-will-not-be-the-end-of-the-pain-61634-32820055/2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aude		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html#comment-5693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 09:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=4341#comment-5693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding the Newcastle case: would you mind explaining why you wrote &quot;10 libraries under threat (was 8)&quot; please? I&#039;m a bit confused by this sentence, as ever since the City Council published its budget proposals in November 2012, those 10 libraries (not 8) have been under threat. The proposals documentation is available at http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/your-council/budget-and-annual-report/local-services-services-people-access where the section on library network reduction mentions a &quot;move to a network of 8 core libraries [down from 18] across the city&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Newcastle case: would you mind explaining why you wrote &#8220;10 libraries under threat (was 8)&#8221; please? I&#8217;m a bit confused by this sentence, as ever since the City Council published its budget proposals in November 2012, those 10 libraries (not 8) have been under threat. The proposals documentation is available at <a href="http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/your-council/budget-and-annual-report/local-services-services-people-access" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/your-council/budget-and-annual-report/local-services-services-people-access</a> where the section on library network reduction mentions a &#8220;move to a network of 8 core libraries [down from 18] across the city&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shirley Burnham		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/03/newcastle-10-swindon-1.html#comment-5692</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shirley Burnham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=4341#comment-5692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ll note that the &#039;Swindon Advertiser&#039; clip is from 2008 !  Thanks to residents (and a council that finally listened to them) we still have 18 staffed hours at Old Town Library.  There are plans afoot, though, to regress to the old ideas next year - when I have it on good authority that  all Swindon&#039;s *small* libraries may be turned over to volunteers.  Swindon residents have but a few months to martial their forces, so that a two-tier library service from 2014 is avoided.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll note that the &#8216;Swindon Advertiser&#8217; clip is from 2008 !  Thanks to residents (and a council that finally listened to them) we still have 18 staffed hours at Old Town Library.  There are plans afoot, though, to regress to the old ideas next year &#8211; when I have it on good authority that  all Swindon&#8217;s *small* libraries may be turned over to volunteers.  Swindon residents have but a few months to martial their forces, so that a two-tier library service from 2014 is avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
