<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;When there are less libraries, less librarians and less money to spend on stock you can&#8217;t be surprised if usage drops&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/09/when-there-are-less-libraries-less-librarians-and-less-money-to-spend-on-stock-you-cant-be-surprised-if-usage-drops.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/09/when-there-are-less-libraries-less-librarians-and-less-money-to-spend-on-stock-you-cant-be-surprised-if-usage-drops.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2013/09/when-there-are-less-libraries-less-librarians-and-less-money-to-spend-on-stock-you-cant-be-surprised-if-usage-drops.html#comment-5817</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=6014#comment-5817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shirley Burnham has asked me to add the following:

&quot;Has it occurred to people to ask why the DCMS has felt the need to go back to 2005/06 to find evidence of a &quot;significant decrease&quot; in library usage?  Could it be that they found that a comparison with 2011/12&#039;s figures (a drop of just 2.6%)  was not &quot;significant&quot; enough to justify their government&#039;s policies and ministers&#039; woeful neglect of the service since taking office?  &quot;

There appears to be a problem that blocks comments at the moment.  Please contact me via ianlibrarian at live.co,uk if you want to add something in the meantime.  Thank you.  Ian.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shirley Burnham has asked me to add the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;Has it occurred to people to ask why the DCMS has felt the need to go back to 2005/06 to find evidence of a &#8220;significant decrease&#8221; in library usage?  Could it be that they found that a comparison with 2011/12&#8217;s figures (a drop of just 2.6%)  was not &#8220;significant&#8221; enough to justify their government&#8217;s policies and ministers&#8217; woeful neglect of the service since taking office?  &#8221;</p>
<p>There appears to be a problem that blocks comments at the moment.  Please contact me via ianlibrarian at live.co,uk if you want to add something in the meantime.  Thank you.  Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
