<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Straw Men and Amateurs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/05/straw-men-and-amateurs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/05/straw-men-and-amateurs.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 2014 20:04:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/05/straw-men-and-amateurs.html#comment-6075</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 17:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=7500#comment-6075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/05/straw-men-and-amateurs.html#comment-6074&quot;&gt;Stephen&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Stephen.  I&#039;m pleased to hear about your experiences with GLL.  That organisation is of course a Trust and so not like an out and out private company like Carillion.  I think also it is worth pointing out that Laing (and LSSI in the USA) appear to have a better record than Carillion - it is the latter company that is messing up the field for the others.  Outsourcing to a Trust does not appear to have caused any major problems for the public that I have as yet noted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/05/straw-men-and-amateurs.html#comment-6074">Stephen</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Stephen.  I&#8217;m pleased to hear about your experiences with GLL.  That organisation is of course a Trust and so not like an out and out private company like Carillion.  I think also it is worth pointing out that Laing (and LSSI in the USA) appear to have a better record than Carillion &#8211; it is the latter company that is messing up the field for the others.  Outsourcing to a Trust does not appear to have caused any major problems for the public that I have as yet noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/05/straw-men-and-amateurs.html#comment-6074</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 06:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=7500#comment-6074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting update on the situation in Notiinghamshire. However, I think the example given of privatisation (Croydon) is a bad one. I live close to the border of Greenwich and regularly use its service. Since being taken over by GLL a few years ago, I have seen nothing but improvements to the service. The staff are so friendly and helpful, reservations that used to cost 95p are now free and when studying I can always find a table! Maybe Nottinghamshire should consider it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting update on the situation in Notiinghamshire. However, I think the example given of privatisation (Croydon) is a bad one. I live close to the border of Greenwich and regularly use its service. Since being taken over by GLL a few years ago, I have seen nothing but improvements to the service. The staff are so friendly and helpful, reservations that used to cost 95p are now free and when studying I can always find a table! Maybe Nottinghamshire should consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
