<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Going postal?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/10/going-postal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/10/going-postal.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Coates		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/10/going-postal.html#comment-6270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Coates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=8275#comment-6270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So that&#039;s £155,500 - in addition to whatever money is being spent to pay for officers of the SCL and their costs 

Why ?? 

Is there any evidence anywhere that these so called &#039;universal offers&#039; have added one user to any public library - or indeed if anyone ( outside the little circle of beneficiaries ) even understands what they mean 

The unversal offers of a public library are free books and other reading in a warm building - and the use of them is falling because they don&#039;t do these things well enough for people to choose to use them .  That&#039;s the problem . Until we tackle that we might as well write off the public library service as a dead loss 

But we seem to be going back to the lunatic days of the last Labour Government in which the MLA spent hundreds of thousands every month on meaningless initiatives and reports which never achieved anything .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#8217;s £155,500 &#8211; in addition to whatever money is being spent to pay for officers of the SCL and their costs </p>
<p>Why ?? </p>
<p>Is there any evidence anywhere that these so called &#8216;universal offers&#8217; have added one user to any public library &#8211; or indeed if anyone ( outside the little circle of beneficiaries ) even understands what they mean </p>
<p>The unversal offers of a public library are free books and other reading in a warm building &#8211; and the use of them is falling because they don&#8217;t do these things well enough for people to choose to use them .  That&#8217;s the problem . Until we tackle that we might as well write off the public library service as a dead loss </p>
<p>But we seem to be going back to the lunatic days of the last Labour Government in which the MLA spent hundreds of thousands every month on meaningless initiatives and reports which never achieved anything .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Anstice		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/10/going-postal.html#comment-6269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Anstice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=8275#comment-6269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Tim.  The money was from Arts Council England. More information can be found at http://www.goscl.com/arts-council-funds-universal-offers/.  Regards, Ian.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim.  The money was from Arts Council England. More information can be found at <a href="http://www.goscl.com/arts-council-funds-universal-offers/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.goscl.com/arts-council-funds-universal-offers/</a>.  Regards, Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim Coates		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2014/10/going-postal.html#comment-6268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Coates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=8275#comment-6268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ian - one of your articles here is headed &quot;SCL offers three invitations to tender&quot; . 

Do you know who is funding the SCL- and what political purpose is intended by the money ?  Who has decided that these projects should have priority over things that libraries need ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian &#8211; one of your articles here is headed &#8220;SCL offers three invitations to tender&#8221; . </p>
<p>Do you know who is funding the SCL- and what political purpose is intended by the money ?  Who has decided that these projects should have priority over things that libraries need ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
