<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Not a good time to be down by two-thirds? Kent and Stockport	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2020/09/not-a-good-time-to-be-down-by-two-thirds-kent-and-stockport.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2020/09/not-a-good-time-to-be-down-by-two-thirds-kent-and-stockport.html</link>
	<description>What&#039;s happening to your library?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:32:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew Dalziel		</title>
		<link>https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/2020/09/not-a-good-time-to-be-down-by-two-thirds-kent-and-stockport.html#comment-49354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Dalziel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.publiclibrariesnews.com/?p=17079#comment-49354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is hard not to see the Princh article on Collaboration as a spoof. It summarises so much wrong with the way many libraries are going. I mean jazz!. Give me a break, and “leveraging the libraries brand”!. Libraries have a brand; they are known for providing books, physical and digital, and information, physical and digital. Weakening the “brand” with unwanted, random, irrelevancies, simply dilutes the brand. Library customers want books and information. The less provided, the fewer the customers. It reminds me of years commuting by train. Loads of money spent on “upgrading” stations and cute retail “opportunities”, when all we Wanted was trains; on time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard not to see the Princh article on Collaboration as a spoof. It summarises so much wrong with the way many libraries are going. I mean jazz!. Give me a break, and “leveraging the libraries brand”!. Libraries have a brand; they are known for providing books, physical and digital, and information, physical and digital. Weakening the “brand” with unwanted, random, irrelevancies, simply dilutes the brand. Library customers want books and information. The less provided, the fewer the customers. It reminds me of years commuting by train. Loads of money spent on “upgrading” stations and cute retail “opportunities”, when all we Wanted was trains; on time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
