Mr Vaizey, in Parliament, with the rose-tinted spectacles
– Brent – council apparently confirms 6 library closures (“apparently” because consultation ending March 4th)
– Calderdale – review to cut £250k inc hours and bookfund cuts
– Croydon – six libraries under threat will remain open until July while “the council looks at ways of keeping them open”.
– Isle of Wight – confirmed 5 libraries to be “volunteer led”, taken out of authority control with option to bid for money for stock, ICT etc.
– Surrey – Consultation before closing – of one month for 5 mobiles, six months for 11 branches
Brent – 6 libraries “look likely to close” as amendments to save them voted down – Harrow Times
Brent – council sounds the death knell for Brent libraries – Harrow Observer
Brent – video of protests at meeting – Harrow Observer
Calderdale – libraries shake-up to save £250k – Evening Courier
Cheshire West and Chester – Save Our Libraries – Facebook
Croydon – ray of hope for libraries – This is Local London
Isle of Wight – coverage of cabinet meeting – Ventnor Blog “DCMS has asked IWC to be used as a case study for community engagement” 5 libraries to be “volunteer led”
Suffolk – US firm LSSI interested in running Suffolk’s libraries – EADT “There is also another organisation that has been in touch”
Suffolk – Protest groups join forces over Suffolk library cuts – EADT (Petition here)
Surrey – Go-ahead for consultation on Surrey library changes – BBC
Walsall – Adjournment debate on Wirral Libraries in Parliament – They Work For You
National News
Ed Vaizey, in Parliament, with the rose-tinted glasses – They Work For You (compare with this article)
Establishing an annual National Libraries Day – Alan Gibbons
Fury over “stupid” restrictions to library ebook loans – Guardian (call for boycott of HarperCollins)
HarperCollins hit by several types of stupid sick – Phil Bradley “I simply cannot begin to describe what a stupid, backward looking and retrograde step I think this is.”
HarperCollins rouses gang of angry librarians – TechEye (USA)
Library campaigners mount legal challneges to closures – Guardian
Library eBook Revolution, Begin – Librarian in Black
March news – Reading Agency “We are particularly concerned about communities losing the expert staff who support reading…We are urging MPs who haven’t already done so to talk to councils about their responsibilities under the 1964 Public Libraries and Museums Act.”
Minister confirms vital role of professional staff (CILIP) – Alan Gibbons
More legal challenges launched over library closures – BookSeller
New legal challenge over library closures – Campaign for the Book “The Culture Minister should not be able ignore the implications of the 1964 … Act”.
Optimistic Pickles’ 40% back office savings would only be 3.6% of total budget – Guardian
Print article | This entry was posted by Ian Anstice on March 1, 2011 at 11:05 pm, and is filed under Uncategorized. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |
about 13 years ago
My two penneth, for what its worth, by definition a privatised library (or “volunteer led”) is no longer a “public library”. To me this phrase does not simply describe a building to which the public have access to with resources to be used by the public, it describes that the service is also owned by and accountable to the public. Once the service is taken out of the public domain public law no longer governs it and cannot be accountable to the public in its operation e.g. the public do not have to be consulted about changes, impact assessments no longer have to be carried out e.t.c. These libraries will be no more public (and I suspect not subject to rules about provision of library services e.t.c.) than a private exhibition by a charity in a public building. That assumes the councils are planning to retain the building and not sell them back to the “volunteers” at the market rate as they planned with the forests.
about 13 years ago
I would agree.