Americans against privatisation, New Zealanders against charging
Sometimes one wonders if other countries are experiencing the same serious issues about (and against) their public libraries as we facing. Certainly I know that our colleagues in Western Europe look upon what is happening here in shock, wondering how anyone can cut what is so obviously such a cheap common good as the public library service. Other days, I think that we are truly all in it together, or at least the English-speaking (strange that) nations are. This is shown today by two reports. One is from New Zealand and is part of a campaign to make free public libraries statutory. It’s weird to read about the UK being an example of good practice but some of the arguments are very apropos in today’s climate. The other, possibly at the moment far more relevant report given recent headlines, is from the American Library Association (ALA) on “Keeping Public Libraries Public”. It is a well-researched, thought-out impassioned paper and one which all advocates, and critics, of public public libraries should read.
393 libraries (319 buildings and 74 mobiles) currently under threat or closed/left council control since 1/4/11 out of c.4612 in the UK (for the complete list by area see the page “Tally by local authority”). Librarian professional body CILIP forecasts 600 libraries under threat (inc. 20% of English libraries). The Public Libraries News figure is obtained from counting up all reports about public libraries in the media each day.
News
Keep public libraries free – Lianza (New Zealand). Campaign to keep public libraries free in New Zealand “New Zealand stands out from countries like Australia, the UK and Canada – all of which protect free public libraries via legislation.”
Keeping public libraries public – ALA. Comprehensive guide to the reasons for keeping public libraries in public hands and the problems with privatisation. Slight American slant but still highly usable.
Merging library services will save £1m – Guardian. “Part of our rationalisation is reducing middle and senior managers, which will need to be fair and equitable, but will be a big chunk of initial savings,” he said. “What we envisage later will be looking at more support systems such as IT.” Ruse said the councils will have to move in stages towards full merger. “It’s a radical idea and the three boroughs will have to effectively manage in a very different way.”
Mutual interest: How the public sector can do more with less in the Big Society – Public Sector Executive. Argues for the Big Society, including the case of Wandsworth’s York Gardens Library. Article does not mention widespread resistance and criticism of the plans.
Northamptonshire – Horror as mobile library faces cuts – Lutterworth Mail. “We’re just horrified at the place it’s stopping. It seems a strange thing to do because where it’s due to stop is a blind corner.”
Print article | This entry was posted by Ian Anstice on June 20, 2011 at 10:14 pm, and is filed under Uncategorized. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |