Loss of libraries to 18% of users is fine: Ed Vaizey on Bolton, Isle of Wight & Lewisham
Ed Vaizey has responded to three of the most branch-cutting authorities to say that he is not currently minded to intervene in any of them. In other words, he sees the loss of 5 out of 15 branches in Bolton, 5 out of 12 in Lewisham and 5 out of 11 in the Isle of Wight as acceptable.
A lose of a third to nearly a half of total service points would normally be seen as quite major but the letter shows that this it is not sufficient to merit intervention. The main reason put forward for this is that the five branches lost in each case were the smallest ones and so represent only small amounts of active borrowers, being 13% in Bolton and 18% in the Isle of Wight, with the real number being smaller due to some users visiting larger branches as well. Mr Vaizey does not tell us the percentage of active users affected in Lewisham but indirectly notes that 17% of visits and 23% of book issues were in the closed branches in 2009/10.
The Isle of Wight/Lewisham letter also says that it accepts that, unlike in Bolton, the Council there has transferred branches to volunteers but says that even if they had closed it would not have affected the final decision. Councils do not need to consider keeping libraries open with volunteers as part of its proposals, although it is clear from the letters that Mr Vaizey would prefer it if they did. The failure of the withdrawn libraries in Lewisham to sustain usage figures is not explained, although there is a suggestion, apparently quite serious, that this may be due to them now having cafes and better reading areas. DCMS has also taken into account continued outreach services and that public consultations were conducted. The Isle of Wight letter notes with approval that the (massive public) discontent with the original proposals led to changes in the final plan.
There’s also a lot of other stuff in there as one would expect from a legal document but the key point to summarise is a cut of service provision for up to 18% active users is fine. A loss of a fifth of book issues due to closures is also acceptable. The number of branches is immaterial. This is of course a minimum limit. Ed Vaizey has not intervened in library authority and so no maximum figure can be calculated. From these letters, one may be entitled to wonder if there is one.
The DCMS notes that “Further representations from any interested parties has been sought for a period up to 17 September 2012.”
- Bolton “minded not to intervene” letter
- Isle of Wight “minded not to intervence” letter
- Lewisham “minded not to intervene” letter
News
- For vote – Screwy Decimal (USA). The importance of public libraries in democracy is described.
- Jelly at the Library – National Library of Wales. “The event will be ideal for start-ups and small to medium-sized enterprises and businesses. We provide the chairs, desks, wi-fi, tea, coffee, lunch and you get to meet other interesting people to talk to and bounce ideas off!” Including assistance from patents office.
- Lest we get too excited: the “Tri-borough” circus– Good Library Blog. “Westminster has 12 libraries and a gross budget of £10.5m. Kensington and Chelsea have 6 libraries and a budget of £6.6m (honestly!) and Hammersmith and Fulham have 7 libraries and a budget of £5.1m. That makes a total of £22.2m to run 25 libraries… an average of about £900k per library.. about 3 times the national average If you don’t know, out of these three only Kensington and Chelsea has a rather dismal – but large- central library worth the name. The rest of the libraries are extremely average for England – the normal mixture of dirt, booklessness and light bulbs not working “. Councils “recharge” a large proportion from each library service thus reducing investment even more and each service has small (£300k, £200k) bookfunds.
- Running libraries the Anythink way – Voices for the Library. A look at the award-winning US Colorado library system: they don’t charge fines, don’t have dewey and call their staff “guides” and other such words. Staff stand up a lot with low staffing levels, library qualifications not essential even at management level.
“One public library system in Colorado has completely rethought how it does business. The Rangeview Library System in Thornton, Colorado, has branded itself “Anythink“, as in, “I think I’m going to head over to the Anythink in Bennett, play guitar hero for a bit, grab a book of one of the bookstore-like categorized shelves, and record my oral history story with the mixed media artist so she can use it in the public history project.”
Sir Terry Pratchett: The Science of Discworld – Youtube. One hour of Terry Pratchett and friends. It’s only tangentially related to public libraries but it’s Terry Pratchett so it’s included here because I can.
- Zadie Smith is right: lives needn’t have limits in a country as rich as ours – Guardian. “Lives needn’t have limits in a country as rich as ours: libraries, playing fields and swimming pools cost peanuts in the grander scheme. The coalition thinks it has the problem of paying for the social good sorted: businesses can run them to make profits, which replace taxes. Its vision for individual lives is starker still: it’s more about seeing who can survive on their wits alone.” 145 comments and counting.
Local News
- Brent – MP Denis McShane “delighted” that the Save Kensal Rise Library Campaign is “forging ahead” – Via Alan Gibbons.Campaigners are “confident that they have a strong and sustainable plan for the future of the library, which includes a unique partnership with Bilbary, the online e-book service run by Tim Coates, former CEO of Waterstones. They also have support from Darren Taylor, who runs four community libraries in Lewisham , and plan to join his Ecosystems computer recycling scheme. The Friends are strengthening their bid to All Souls by asking for pledges towards the first year’s running costs of £70,000. By around midday on Monday 3rd September they had raised £46,324, with another £23,676 needed by Friday 7th September.”
“The MP and former Minister Denis MacShane, who was wrongly led to believe last week that the campaign had come to an end, said, “I am delighted that the campaign is forging ahead. I regret that I got the wrong end of some stick last week when I was led to believe the closure was done and dusted. I repeat my appeal to the Fellows of All Souls to conjure up the spirits of their illustrious predecessors who helped found the Library. Books make us into full human beings and all the social media and screens in the world will never replace the thrill of turning a page to find out what’s next.”
- Croydon – Wandsworth sets up private company to run Croydon libraries – Inside Croydon. “One phrase in the document stands out: “The current budget for the library service is in excess of £5 million but the affordability figure for the Wandsworth contract is £4.9 million so it is anticipated that the tender process will result in a reduction in costs to the council.” Croydon’s library budget is £7.5 million, with a goal of £2.5 million in “cost savings” post-privatisation.” … “Could there possibly be another agenda at work here? Given that one of the remaining two bidders is a subsidiary of developer John Laing, Croydon’s multi-million-pound “partner” in the £450million urban regeneration vehicle – or “civic property speculation” as we prefer to call it – it presents a real possibility that some of the libraries will be greedily looked upon a valuable land bank for whoever is ultimately chosen as the library “operator”.
- Devon – Get involved in Devon’s Book for Summer – Reading Groups. “A limited number of free copies have been distributed via Devon County Council’s Libraries in Kingsbridge and Ivybridge, including to local reading groups and through giveway displays. A few of these copies have also been put in the community as a local Book Crossing. Stickers inside the free books have encourage readers to pass the book on to friends, family or simply leave on a park bench or bus when they have finished, allowing as many people to take part as possible. Members of Devon libraries can also borrow or reserve copies from any of Devon County Council’s libraries.”
- Moray – Gruffalo author set for visit to Moray – STV. “Over 140 school pupils from throughout Moray will perform songs and plays based on their favourite children’s stories for the author of ‘The Gruffalo’.”
- Oxford – Social housing plan approval rests on library grant condition – Oxford Mail. “a final decision should be deferred so officers can agree a request from Oxford County Council to provide Old Marston Library with £1,801 [sic]. The money would go towards library infrastructure and book stock. The application is due to be heard by the city council’s east area planning committee at a meeting on Thursday at 6pm. “
- Somerset – Burnham on Sea library to close for a month during major refurb – Burnham on Sea.com. Self service is being introduced into library after its successful installation at Taunton.
- Wolverhampton – Some Wolverhampton libraries facing loss of books – Express and Star. “More than 10,000 people have signed petitions against the plans, which will see up to nine libraries and seven community centres closed or merged to create “community hubs”. But there was a pledge today that the total number of books on offer across the city would be the same – despite stocks at individual libraries being reviewed.” … “Currently Finchfield Library, which is earmarked for closure, has almost 20,000 books and campaigners fear that they will lose out if it is moved to Bradmore or if community services move into the library and take up space.”
Print article | This entry was posted by Ian Anstice on September 3, 2012 at 10:00 pm, and is filed under Uncategorized. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |
about 12 years ago
5 libraries have not been closed in Lewisham. In the face of savage cuts our council has found a way to keep a decent library service in the borough, and deserves praise not condemnation. But then I live here and use the libraries, unlike those who pontificate, or listen to the one or two loudmouths with bees in the bonnets.
about 12 years ago
Thanks, Lewisham resident. I am happy to listen and publish positive views about the volunteer-run/social enterprise libraries in your borough. Email me (or get whoever you think is best to email me) at ianlibrarian@live.co.uk if you want your views expressed.
about 12 years ago
I think its worth putting this comment on todays guardian story from a Lewisham volunteer to balance the Lewisham resident view:
“Funnily enough, I volunteer at one of the Lewisham branches mentioned so I have some insight into this. While the volunteers, particularly the full-timers, are trying their best, it’s simply impossible to provide a proper service when you rely on a rolling procession of people who have never worked with books and who don’t know about basic library procedures.
To make matters worse, the company running the library is cheap enough that they refuse to even fix the toilets, meaning the staff often have to go round the corner to a bar or coffee shop instead. And of course the supply of new books has been effectively stopped with staff unsure whether the books still there will be transferred to other Lewisham libraries or not (because giving council property to a private company would of course be completely unfeasible).
If there are less people using the libraries, it’s because the service has deteriorated because of the government’s negligence, not because the customers (many of which are elderly, vulnerable or parents of small children, who live nearby and who can’t feasibly reach another of the borough’s libraries) don’t want a library service.”
The link to the article is here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/sep/05/library-closures-ed-vaizey?INTCMP=SRCH
about 12 years ago
Thanks for this. I have done so.
about 12 years ago
In response to “Lewisham resident’s” comments, I’m from neighbouring Bromley and sometimes use the Downham Library. Lewisham Council was given two choices for its library service: a cut in opening hours or a cull of five libraries. It chose the barbaric cut of nearly half its library service after a decision by its mayor. Downham is now open til 10pm most weekdays. This is rather extensive opening, which is rather unnecessary, after a poor, thoughtless decision by the council. Once I went in to Downham at 9pm and it was empty. Not only that, Lewisham’s decision at the time was very unpopular, I remember reading this blog which showed a sit in at New Cross Library, followed by Lewisham Council closing it a day earlier than expected so people weren’t allowed to protest.
Bromley have been far more creative. Firstly it’s teamed up with Bexley to cut back office staff. Secondly it ran a consultation earlier this year, and by the looks of things it will cut opening or maybe close one or two libraries (Burnt Ash and Southborough) rather than one of its initial ideas to cut eight.
FYI Council report from July:
http://cds.bromley.gov.uk/documents/s50001878/Part%201%20Report%20Template.pdf
Similarly, Southwark is facing similar, if not deeper cuts, but again is keeping all libraries open, even refurbishing Peckham (currently) and opening Canada Water in November.
People have every right to be annoyed with Lewisham, as instead of thinking about how it can manage its costs, it went for the “easy” option and shut down libraries. This is precisely what Brent did, although, to give credit to Lewisham, they wouldn’t even let volunteers take over.
about 12 years ago
That’s very interesting information, thank you, Bromley Resident. I think each and every one of the 151 library authorities are approaching things in different ways and I am glad to hear that Bromley is doing things better. Certainly, they’re not in the same mental category I keep Lewisham in.
about 12 years ago
Dear Readers,
I would like to comment about the comments made from the person saying they are volunteering:
The toilets have been breaking down for over 9 years in this library because of a bad plumbing installation and actually these toilets had a short term fix back on the 6th August and we have had three quote to fix this problem once and for all instead of what was being done before with short term fixes being done all the time and costing more money in the long term.
Regarding the books – We have had over 600 new books delivered over the past two months, and we will be getting more new books soon and we are put of the online Library service where library users can see the catalogue of over five million books and have them sent to their community library.
Eco has just spent £36,000 fixing the roofs which have been leaking in all the libraries, in fact if we had not have got Sydenham done before the bad weather in June and July, the library would have had to close for health and safety reason. There were leaks in the childrens area and the electrics were starting to have problems because of the roofs. So I do not think we are doing things on the cheap.
We have now started painting the upstairs rooms, which have not been used for many year, and our first tenant we have given space to is City Reads.
Regarding visitor numbers using the libraries, these went down when we first took over because the press kept saying they were closing and people thought they were closed, now we have got the numbers back up and some months we have had more visitors than before.
Regards
Darren Taylor
Darren
about 12 years ago
This debate is getting silly. Not all councils can take the same approach to libraries as not all councils face the same levels of cuts or the same challenges.
I am happy that Lewisham have found a way to keep their libraries open when they have to face significant social services demands that Bromley could never dream of.
As for the comments comparing Lewisham to Southwark, well Lewisham’s capital investment in Downham, Manor House and Deptford has been fantastic. Incidentally, when was the last major capital investment by Bromley in their libraries, Bromley resident?
And, Bromley resident, please do not post second hand comments as an effort to provide “balance”.
The lack of reality around the libraries debate is astounding.
Meanwhile, Ian, thanks for your offer to participate in the debate. Sadly, I think I will decline. If you express a view that the library campaigners deem heretical, no matter how sincerely you hold it, you are damned for eternity and often subject to rather unpleasant comment. I’ll restrict myself to comments such as these if it’s all the same to you.
about 12 years ago
Apologies, Bromley resident, i slighted you incorrectly, it is Trevor Craig who is posting second hand comment as balance.
Sorry, Bromley resident, my mistake.
I turn my attention to Mr Craig. Mr Craig, are you a Lewisham resident and a regular user of Lewisham libraries?
I mean, if you actually come from Oxfordshire or somewhere then can I suggest you stop telling people like me who actually live here what we should think about our services, because we live here, and you don’t.
about 12 years ago
“Regarding visitor numbers using the libraries, these went down when we first took over because the press kept saying they were closing and people thought they were closed, now we have got the numbers back up and some months we have had more visitors than before”
Will the Bookseller report this? Will campaigners celebrate this?
Of course not. Not in a million years.
about 12 years ago
Would like to report that Grove Park Community Library has had its roof fixed and is now going through a whole re-decoration.