Ed Vaizey publishes comparative library data. Sort of. Ish.

Editorial

The DCMS has released the latest (2013) reports showing how well each library authority are doing compared to the others.  This was a flagship (in so far as anything libraries-related Ed Vaizey does can be so called) policy last year and it is intended to allow anyone to hold their authority to account.  It is also intended to show who are the most successful councils which the others can then copy.  Sadly, there wasn’t much evidence of this happening last year: or at least it didn’t hit the newspapers. I was looking for mentions and there were barely any.  More could doubtless have been made of the data but the minister, in his wisdom (presumably the DCMS is so cash strapped it needs the money too?) has decided to charge £475 (plus VAT, naturally) to each authority if it wants the fully accessible works.  One could see that as shooting one’s own policy in the foot a little as, on the one hand, Ed is keen to show how open the data is but, on the other hand, £570 is too much for many to actually go the whole hog and actually use it.

This year, the cracks are starting to show even further.  It is entirely voluntary whether library services send in the data that the reports depend on. Unsurprisingly, it looks like 10 out of the 151 have simply refused to do so this year.  It’s impossible to tell why (budget cuts meaning there’s no staff to send in the information? A desire not to be embarrassed? The suspicion no one actually uses it?) but the mere fact that it’s not comprehensive limits its usefulness. Even worse it has, as of checking now, only 78 authorities actually on the list: one hopes the omission of the others are only temporary. In fact, this half-baked launch is inadvertently demonstrating the very weakness of Vaizey’s own approach – making things voluntary means the loss of the comprehensive and efficient and cutting staff to the bone means things don’t go right. How ironic, Mr Vaizey.

Changes

More >

Triumphant opening of Manchester Central Library

Editorial

The opening of Manchester Central on Saturday marks the last of the three Big Shiny New Libraries (the others being Birmingham and Liverpool) started in the dog days of the old government.  The reviews of the new Manchester library (and of the other two) have all been, as far as I can see, positive, with special mention going to the mixture of the very new and the old.  This is a combination that also worked very successfully in Liverpool but, in my opinion anyway, a lot less so in Birmingham where the Shakespeare room for some reason was shoehorned on to the roof. The big points emerging from Manchester are the increase in the stock on public view, the large number of computers, the archives on display and the beautiful refurbishment of the old sections, notably the central dome.  Although it cost £50 million, people seem to think it’s worth the money. I can’t wait to go.

Changes

More >

Watch this video and feel your inner librarian shout YES

Editorial

This is a great video you need to watch.  Have a listen and think about the differences between the can-do attitude of this librarian and how we should be the same.  This, let’s not beat about the bush, is an utterly fantastic talk that shows how important and adventurous libraries should be.

What to expect from libraries in the 21st century: Pam Sandlian Smith at TEDxMileHigh – Friends of the Aurora Public Library.

Highlights include a child’s puppet show (with an important point at the end), the need to say yes, and (honestly) 300 goats. The difference between timorous rules-bound UK public libraries and the well-funded open-minded US model is what strikes me as well.  This library includes a puppet stage, media room and a 3D printer.  Does any library authority in the UK have all three? I doubt it.

“You can learn anything if you make it playful”

“Would you risk jail time to defend your favourite book?”

“We are the cornerstones of democracy. Everyone has a seat at our table, whether you’re a millionaire of if you’re homeless”

Ideas

More >

Library spending on the four parts of the UK compared

Editorial

A full judicial review to the deep cuts on Lincolnshire’s library service have been allowed by the High Court on all four grounds.  This will be a historic case as it will be the first to challenge on the “comprehensive and efficient” terminology of the 1964 Public Libraries and Museums Act.  All other challenges have been on other grounds, notably the Equalities Act.

Wales has become the first constituent part of the United Kingdom to start automatic library membership in schools.  Every primary schoolchild will be allowed to borrow two books “straight away”, with full lending privileges given when proof of address has been given. Following on my post yesterday, lauding the Welsh for actually having things like standards and a national marketing strategy, Librariesmatter has kindly supplied me with the figures for the different nations. Let’s have a look …

Based on Cipfa 2012/13. Per 1000 head per population.
Based on Cipfa 2012/13. Per 1000 head per population. 

So Wales and Scotland have more visitors per 1000 population (and Wales wins out on book issues too) than England but they spend more money to do it.

Cipfa nations graph

England spends considerably less than the other nations on libraries per 1000 population. A lot less compared to Scotland.  Presumably the more widely spread out population has something to do with that.

England comes out on top on average though.

Which means English cost per issue and visit is the lowest, despite having less visitors and issues than Wales.

Changes

On the radar

  • Bromley – “Drastic cuts planned” in opening hours and staffing.

More >

Your last chance to have a say on English public libraries

Editorial
Well, that’s it. Looks like I’m working in the wrong country.  Check out the quote from Jane Purdie below from Wales where they’ve quite clearly been doing things so much better than in England.  They  have a national marketing strategy, with refurbishments, central support and a pile of other stuff which has led to a 9% increase in usage since 2007/8.  England, with it’s emphasis on localism and austerity, on the other hand have not been so successful.  Perhaps those doing the independent review into public libraries in England should know about it – along with any other thoughts you may have about ways forward.  It’s basically your last chance to tell them, though, because submissions end on Friday. Go for it, I say.  At this point, what exactly do English public libraries have to lose?

Changes

More >

The survival of libraries lies in positive promotion

Changes

More >

The Library Cuts Symphony

Editorial

The familiar music of local people choosing between seeing their library close and taking it over themselves is playing louder these days.  North Yorkshire, which has had volunteer libraries for a couple of years, is looking at transferring another 23 of its 52 that way: leaving only 12 “hub” branches with paid staff.  It joins other authorities like Lincolnshire in aiming for a future where the number of volunteer library outnumbers the number of paid.

I’m glad to say, though that, against this, other songs can be heard.  Some more information is coming out about the refurbished Manchester Central Library, soon to be reopened, and it’s sounding rather wonderful.  I’m hoping for some real “Ode to Joy” from that one.  East Sussex are also planning some happy numbers – two new libraries are planned – although one of these is postponed.  This aspect of the performance is dieing away: Manchester is the last of the Big New Shiny Libraries to be completed and no more of that scale are planned.

Then, against these competing doom-laden and happy pieces comes another sound.  Another sound that is not musical at all: it’s the sound of the mocking laughter of crows. Step forward those companies who have been lucky enough to take advantage of PFI contracts for new libraries.  It looks like the recognised discounted rate of return on such contracts is 7% per year.  How authorities could do with that money now. Let’s hope Manchester and East Sussex are getting better deals.

FInally, there is something else.  The sound of silence from the minister while the Library Cuts Symphony continues and, the increasing suspicion of those who care, that many in Government will applaud when the work is finished … and avert their eyes from the disenfranchised in the streets (and secretly blame them for their lack of entrepreneurial spirit) when they leave the theatre .

Please send any news, views or corrections to ianlibrarian@live.co.uk

Changes

More >

The Final Fifth, Welsh Trusts and US success

Editorial

Blaenau Gwent looks likely to be come the first Welsh authority I am aware of to pass control of its public libraries to a non-profit trust.  Let’s hope it’s more successful than the outsourcing in Croydon where it has been confirmed that the loss of 11 library staff was among the first actions of Carillion when it took over. This has not impressed the Labour opposition there who confirm they will retake control of the library service if they win the forthcoming election.

There’s a couple of interesting reports just been released.  The UK one by the Carnegie UK Trust concerns British projects to get online the final one-fifth of the population.  Although it mentions libraries in a positive way, it does not devote one of its case studies to a public library project. The other report is from the US Pew Research Centre which confirms the vital place that public libraries have in American life.

Changes

More >

Some more good ideas from US Movers and Shakers

Ideas

More >

15 ideas stolen from library Movers and Shakers

Editorial

You’ll notice a lot more items under the “Ideas” heading than normal.  This is because many of the US “Movers and Shakers” 2014 of the library world have been announced – and many of them are on the list precisely because of the ideas they have.  I’ve read through all of the biographies released so far and the list below is what strikes me as new ideas I’ve not seen in the UK.  Some of it may seem fairly obvious, such as storytimes in cafes, but so what, that’s the beauty of it – how many libraries near you actually do that? Others show differences between the US and the UK that may be more difficult to emulate: for instance, they do a heck of a lot more over the summer holidays for instance in keeping up the educational skills of children.  British libraries do that as well of course, but it tends to be only formally done with Reading, not anything else.  Looks like we’re missing a trick.

Another trick we’re missing is sharing best practice in the way that Movers and Shakers does in the United States.  I hear that CILIP may be instituting something similar to this soon and I really hope it comes off in spades.  I says that because it isn’t just about promoting the achievements of (I’ve seen the phrase, honest) “Librarian Rock Stars” or celebrating success: rather, it is about spreading good ideas and hope.  It’s also about encouraging the taking of risk and being entrepreneurial (in the best sense of that word). There’s never been a time when that is so important for UK libraries to do a bit of that.

Changes

Swindon Old Town Library to be reduced to 18 hours per week.

Ideas

  1. Using what the library already has for education – “Libraries should use available technology to provide opportunities for project-based programs, where patrons can show off what they create.” Over the past two years her Mad Scientists and Math and Science Labs programs have included deconstructing computers and creating chemical reactions with everyday items, like hot sauce packets from Taco Bell. She’s also incorporated more high-tech tools into her technology programming, writing grants for inexpensive Arduino microcontrollers, Raspberry Pi computers, and laptops.”
  2. Collaboration between school and public libraries – “Limitless libraries” program: where stock and membership (and, as importantly, bulk book ordering) is shared between systems for the benefit of all.
  3. Guerilla storytime – Practical sessions at conferences sharing best practice for story times.  Blog Storytime Underground.
  4. Buying ebooks rather than using an e-book provider like Overdrive.  229% increase in issues and increased independence.
  5. LibraryReads – Website showing top ten recently published titles recommended by librarians becomes great promotional tool.
  6. Moving bookstock from Dewey to bookstore model. No sign of how successful this has been though.
  7. LiLi –  A LiLi  is a “souped-up Nissan Cube with more than $25,000 in audiovisual enhancements, an Xbox Kinect, a custom-built mount with a 37″ LCD screen, tower speakers” … “Since 2012, stereotype-shattering LiLi has reached more than 50,000 people through over 160 visits to local community events and social service agencies”
  8. Community cards – ” provide library membership to people with no fixed address: for many authorities in the UK which require proof of address, this sounds like a good idea. Interesting to see how it works in practice (rate of losses etc).
  9. Listening stations – Headphones etc for those with visual difficulty to listen to talking books in the library.
  10. Library as incubator – Providing library space and resources to encourage Arts projects. Website.
  11. Summer Learning Challenge – “Based on research about STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education and learning skills defined by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, it draws kids into learning through child-centered, active learning experiences—including science experiments, games, and creative activities—that reflect literacy skills”.
  12. 2:1 stock purchasing – If there are two reservations for one book then another copy is bought.  Encourages reservations and popular book stock.
  13. Storytimes at coffee shops to promote public libraries.  People have to know about libraries in order to use them,
  14. Summer reading app – “will offer games, reminders to read, digital badges, and community connections, as well as gather statistics for librarians”
  15. Microgrants – $2500 grants for “initiatives that offer new, innovative library services”.

More >