Lincolnshire Council’s consultation gets into further hot water … and has national implications

Editorial

Lincolnshire Council appear to be producing a masterclass in how not to introduce cuts to a library service.  First, they announced a raft of closures as close as possible as they could away with to minimum provision while presenting no options other than closure or unpaid labour. Then the consultation itself appears somewhat skewed and has been called “a complete joke” by campaigners and five famous authors. Then some consultations for the libraries were arranged in places more than ten miles away from the threatened libraries themselves … and now we have the news that the “consultation” meetings themselves are little more than sessions being held on how users can volunteer in their libraries, complete with a facilitator from the University of Sheffield to help them to do it.  Why this matters is that there is a legal requirement for a genuine consultation before changes are made to a library service.  Even the supine Ed Vaizey repeatedly has mentioned the need for one as a sign that a council is complying with legislation.  Given what has been seen so far, Lincolnshire are sailing especially close to the wind in meeting it.

On the other hand, a councillor has appeared on ITV to say he can foresee the possibility of more “libraries” at the end of the process than at the beginning, due to the semi-forced use of volunteers, while saving £2 million for the Council. If the consultation stands and the cuts go through, that’s the sort of result that other councils will take notice of, much to the detriment of public libraries nationwide. Whether they get away with it or are called in for judicial review remains to be seen. It’s the sort of thing that in another era would have had the attention of the Libraries Minister but the current one, Ed Vaizey, will doubtless continue his policy of inaction, seeing how things play out on the ground and leaving it to cash-strapped locals to do what he has consistently not done himself. It’s worth noting that some CILIP members are not entirely happy with Ed for his past record on the subject and have set up a website to encourage a vote of no confidence in him at that organisation’s AGM. Of course, he may not listen to them as well but there comes a time when one has to make a stand on something … and the terminal decline of the local public library presided over by uninterested politicians seems to be as good a place as any to start.

Changes

Ideas

More >

Different motivations … and zombie / lego librarians

Editorial 

There is some discontent in Birmingham as the board of trustees for the big new city Library appears packed with businessmen.  This has raised the ire of those who think it needs to be more diverse.  It comes down to different views of who is best to run a public library:  someone well-connected with money and a knowledge of business / how things work? Who can perhaps raise some money for it in these tough times? Or someone closer to the ground who understands local communities and ensures the library stays relevant to those people who need it the most?  It’s clear which way the council has voted.

The big cuts in Lincolnshire continue to make the news, with the ire now being directed against the council for choosing to hold the consultations sometimes ten miles or more from the libraries that may actually close.  The council argues this is to provide more space and that more meetings will be held if necessary.  Local users suspect darker motives.

Changes

Idea

More >

Wednesday 24th July 2013

Changes

More >

Edinburgh visitors up 15%: the England/Scotland divide

Editorial

Good to see that the award-winning Edinburgh library service, well-known for its initiatives has had a 15% increase in visitors last year compared to 2010.  Doubtless the two new libraries helped but the embracing of new technology has also been a factor.  Helpful too has been the successful public protest that meant that cuts proposed in 2011/12 did not come to pass.  South of the border, such cuts largely do come to pass and so it’s far harder for library services to be as successful as their northern brethren.  The suspicion here is that library usage mirrors library funding – so cuts to the budget means less usage, which of course makes cuts to budget more likely. Just look at Lincolnshire where the cuts are being pushed through with the somewhat self-contradictory argument that libraries are (a) not strongly needed and (b) it’s expected that people will work for free to keep them open. One ticket to Edinburgh please.

Changes

More >

Payday loan blocking and royal babies

Editorial

More and more English councils are banning payday loan sites from all of their computers, including ones in their libraries.  This raises a few questions  The first is that such sites are not illegal and cause no harm to anybody but presumably the adult who uses them.  They are thus different to the porn/terrorism websites that libraries already filter.  The second is that they’re not illegal so one would have thought that it is up to the adult in question to decide on these matters, not the council.  The third is that the Council are banning websites and the library services are all having to absolutely obey instructions and do the same.  Indeed, one suspects that the vast majority of library services couldn’t stop the banning if they wanted to because it is the council IT department that handles such things and not the library service. Finally, because the library staff are all employed by the councils making the decisions, they would be disciplined if they spoke out publicly against it.  Just in case you’re wondering, my own authority has not yet banned them which is why I can write this piece now.

More >

A place for the vulnerable … but, sadly, they don’t seem to be a priority right now

 

Changes

Ideas

More >

Fancy owning the library you work in? York goes Mutual.

Editorial 

Another day, another experimental model of library governance.  York have agreed to turn over its library and archives service to a mutual two-thirds owned by staff and one-third by the public.  It’s unclear as to what this effectively means in practice (will the shareholders be paid dividends?), although there does appear to be some risk involved.  It hopes to cut costs by £450k over three years by doing this, with the contract lasting for five years and with eligibility for tax breaks.  Unions are not enthusiastic about the change but the Council says it’s either this or direct cuts to the service. A council that has gone for the cuts route is Lincolnshire, where it has been announced that slightly over half of its 32 threatened librarieshave had at least some interest from the community to take them over rather than see them closed.  The council are clear that the libraries will close unless local people work in them unpaid.

Thousands of miles away, the mayor of Miami- Dade in Florida is wanting to close a large proportion of his libraries as he thinks they’re out of date – however, a TV report shows bustling libraries, depended on by the young and unemployed so much that the system gets over six million visits a year.  Perhaps the mayor should have done research before making such a rash claim.  As the teenagers in the report suggest, perhaps also one of the Miami libraries would have been a good place to start.

Ideas

Changes

More >

Austerity in Spain boosts library use … so why not so much in the UK?

Editorial 

There’s a very interesting piece in the Independent on public libraries in Spain that report on a big rise in library usage there since the austerity measures came into force a few years ago.  It’s also interesting to read about a library there that seems to be a doppelganger for Friern Barnet, with locals taken it over after the council closed it.  What I find interesting about this is that Spain, like the USA, is seeing a rise in library usage to a level that is reported as historically high while at the same time facing cuts to the service itself.  This is not the case in the UK, where Austerity appears to have cut service provision but not provided a related boost in usage.  It is not clear why this is is, although if I had to put money on it, it would be the (still) higher comparative levels of welfare provision in this country and the relatively higher access rates to the internet (still lower then the rich of course) amongst the poor.  I’m not sure we can be happy about this but with tough cuts to benefits in the UK starting to take effect this year and the next, it may be that usage will start shooting up.  We are already starting to see this to some extent with the introduction of the online-only Universal Jobmatch.  Certainly, it would strengthen the position of public libraries in the UK if they were used rather more … the fact that we’d be doing more with less would also doubtless please the politicians too.

Cuts to Doncaster libraries have been controversial for several years but it hasn’t gone to court until now.  The Royal Court of Justices will be hearing the case at the end of this month, based on questionable legality of the mayor of the time (now no longer) pushing through cuts to libraries against the opposition of the majority of councillors.

Ideas

Changes

More >

Trying to save her parents money by choosing the smallest library books

Editorial

Some interesting responses about the suggested no confidence motion on Ed Vaizey at the forthcoming CILIP AGM, reported on yesterday.  None of them actually defend the man. If you’re a CILIP member and are interested, email noconfidenceinvaizey@gmail.com for more information.

I look forward to hearing Michael Rosen on the future of public libraries in a two-part Radio Four programme in August and September.  He’s a keen advocate for libraries, comes up with great ideas (see his passion for automatic library cards for schoolchildren for example) and, as a non-librarian, can see things from the outside.

Ideas

Changes

More >

Motion of no confidence in the libraries minister Ed Vaizey

 

News

I’ve seen for the last couple of years loads of people complaining about how ineffective Mr Ed Vaizey is.  There’s even a rather good song about it. People are especially annoyed that his pro-library comments (like this 2011 and this whole list ) compare so badly to his actions (or inactions).  It’s no surprise then that the recent BMA vote of no confidence in Jeremy Hunt has got people thinking. I’ve had three separate groups of people mention to me the possibility of a vote of no confidence in him, and this appears to be finally getting off the ground with an email sent to me today,  If you are a member of CILIP, therefore, have a read of this below:

Motion of no confidence in Ed Vaizey to go to CILIP AGM

We are calling on CILIP’s Annual General Meeting in September to support a motion of no confidence in Ed Vaizey, following the example of the British Medical Association, who passed a similar motion of no confidence in the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt. The motion, in draft form reads as follows:

“In view of his failures to enforce the 1964 Public Libraries and Museums Act, this Annual General Meeting of CILIP has no confidence in Ed Vaizey, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Culture, Communications and Creative Industries, and instructs Council to work with all other interested parties to protect library, information and knowledge services”

CILIP members interested in supporting the motion are invited to contact noconfidenceinvaizey@gmail.com for more information.

In other news, the very same Mr Vaizey has confirmed that, pending a consultation, Public Lending Right will be extended to library e-book loans but only those “borrowed on site”.  Quite apart from seeming to miss the whole point about e-books, this will represent a tiny proportion of e-book lending and is likely to be seen as a crumb at best.  More welcome to the Society of Authors is the news that the overall amount their members will get next year will not be cut.  Such is what passes for good news these days.

Finally, I have received confirmation from Herefordshire that their decision to stop all interlending requests was cancelled after advice received from Arts Council England.  This was, presumably, that the new ban contravened the 1964 Act but this is not explicitly stated, Whatever the reason, the  breakdown of the councils’ estimate of £46 per interlending request makes scary reading. The Council inform me that they are reviewing the interlending charge, along with all of their services.

More >