- Latest
- By authority
- Changes by local authority
- List of UK volunteer libraries
- List of Library Trusts and prospective Library Trusts
- Fine free libraries
- List of Staffless Libraries in the United Kingdom and beyond
- Literature Festivals with library involvement
- Governance
- Volunteer-run libraries
- 2010-2014: From Community Library to Community-run library: a look at the impact of volunteers
- Pros: reasons for volunteer “community libraries”
- Cons: reasons against volunteer “community libraries”
- Practicalities
- “The reality is very different”: A volunteer library manager speaks
- Are volunteer libraries statutory or non-statutory?
- Four views on volunteer libraries: Sue Charteris, AnneMarie Naylor, Marylyn Haines-Evans of the WI and Ian Anstice
- The Risk Exposures of Volunteer Libraries
- A crude strategy but here to stay: Biddy Casselden on volunteer public libraries in the United Kingdom
- Council assistance for volunteers
- International
- Further reading
- Trusts
- Efficiencies
- Increasing income
- Volunteer-run libraries
- Why libraries?
- Fighting for libraries
- Archives
- Old lists arranged by UK library service
- What do public library staff do?
- Transcripts of library related programmes
- Guest posts
- Indigenous Knowledge Centres: Queensland Public Libraries finding a niche
- 3D Printers & Maker Spaces
- A Library is not just for Christmas
- The CCC/Tsutaya library miracle in Japan: combined bookshop libraries
- Maker Spaces in Libraries – The state of the art December 2013
- A glimpse of Tokyo library life, by Sue Charteris
- Relative Poverty: A display designed especially for libraries
- Nick Poole on what can we learn from the past to inform the future of public libraries
- A home for the homeless: Rachael Rivera and the Auckland Library Streeties
- Dancing Darth Vaders And Talking To Astronauts: Liam Cookson talks MozFest 2017
- A little less conversation: Nick Poole from CILIP writes about the problems with public libraries and action needed
- The Amazing Grace of Public Libraries (or aromatherapy for local living)
- Angry about cuts to Newport Libraries
- Libraries Taskforce Kathy Settle sets the records straight
- Thema: Graham Bell describes Thema, the new subject classification for the global book industry
- Glossary of common library terms
- LS&S (formally known as LSSI).
- Political
- Carillion and libraries
- Useful
- Advertising
The pros and cons of commercial involvement in libraries
There was an interesting difference of opinion shown over the decision by the Society of Chief Librarians to welcome the involvement of 2,000 Halifax Bank employees offering their time to help out as IT volunteers in public libraries. This in turn opened the whole topic of for-profit companies being involved in public libraries. This page aims to review the arguments on both sides and add a few thoughts of my own. It does not claim to be comprehensive and I am happy to add further views (or even evidence, of which there is remarkably little).
In favour
- The involvement of companies can provide free aid to public libraries, with no concrete cost to the service other than in management. In the case of the Halifax, the pilot gave 40 hours of time and a national roll-out is estimated at giving a maximum of 85 working days per year of assistance.
- Such involvement can result in major funding benefits for libraries. In the USA there are significant examples of private funding of public libraries and education. For example, Amazon (or at least the Bezos Family Foundation) fund projects in Californian schools.
- Reputational improvement for the library. By linking in public libraries with cutting-edge companies like Google, the public library can show it is changing with the times and can challenge the traditional library stereotype. The Manchester Evening News article on the Google Digital Garage in Manchester Central Library was shared an impressive 837 times.
“This joint initiative will enhance our existing range of services for small businesses across Greater Manchester, strengthening the significant contribution of public libraries to supporting the creation of new jobs and growth within the local economy.” Sir Richard Leese, Leader of Manchester City Council on the Google Digital Garage.
- Currying political favour. Partnering with private companies very much ties in with the preferences of the current Conservative Government and, to some extent, with the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties as well. This can improve the reputation of the library (or, more cynically, the partnering organisation) with central and local government.
- The idea that public libraries are some temple of virtuous neutrality is a pipe dream now, if it ever existed in the first place. Public libraries accepted the money of steel magnate Andrew Carnegie a century ago and that did not do the sector any harm. Besides, if such esteemed places like the National Gallery has a Sainsbury Wing then it a special kind of narcissism to think that public libraries should not.
- Even if neutrality is the ideal, that is hardly relevant in the current climate where every penny counts. Would you prefer a closed library or the Ronald MacDonald Library? If the answer is the former, do you think the actual users of the building , who rely on it, would take such a principled stand? In a less extreme example, there are hardly enough staff (especially specifically trained) to go around in many libraries at the moment so any extra assistance, especially provided in an expert and structured way, is a bonus.
“To reassure stakeholders and customers who will understandably have a view that all off this sounds to be contrary to the ethos of library services to provide free and neutral public spaces, there is no hard sell (or even soft sell) from the Digital Inclusion Stakeholder partners in libraries. The significant workforce volunteer hours presented by Barclays and Halifax are focussed on supporting people’s digital skills in communities. The volunteers from both organisations are very well trained, very skilled, and very dedicated. Just as library staff and volunteers are, of course. So one group should compliment the other.” Nick Stopforth, Libraries Task Force.
- Gives a positive headline, even if the actual nuts and bolts of the project are questionable.
- The free market view is that private companies are, by their very nature, to be welcomed in to all spheres. Holders of this view would likely be for any such partnering or investment at all, regardless of detriment to the service.
- Commercial partnering can be all gain to public libraries with no loss incurred.
- Take the benefit for ourselves or it will simply be taken elsewhere. “I think that we have a choice – our corporate partners could provide those free, neutral digital skills support hours in other venues, or they could provide the support in libraries“.
- Such partnering can be withdrawn at any time and should be reviewed. So, therefore, even if a problem does become apparent, libraries can withdraw from it.
Against
- The gains can sometimes be remarkably small. Even at tops, the Halifax involvement of 85 days represents around one full-time equivalent member of staff, at perhaps £25,000 equivalent for the whole country. The time spent in implementing the programme in individual branches, not to mention the national roll-out over the 151 different library services, could conceivably come to the same amount. of management staff time.
- When it comes to banks involving themselves in public libraries, there is the problem that it was the banking crisis that kicked off the credit crunch and thus the cuts to local council budgets in the first place. Private companies are also – including Google, who signed a “sweetheart deal” this week of paying just £130m to cover tax from 2005 to the end of 2015 in the UK – sometimes accused of tax avoidance. The lack of tax collected from these companies is responsible for a large part of the budget deficit and thus the cuts to public libraries. We should therefore not be grateful for the companies who are at least partially responsible for cuts to public libraries improving their reputations (or taking advantage of cheap or even free room hire) by using library buildings.
- Libraries should be entirely neutral in all things. The public who believe in the neutrality of public libraries may think again if they think the answer received is biased due to commercial consideration.
“nothing is free”. Barclays aren’t offering this for free with no immediate return. They are doing it because there is a business advantage in them doing so. ” Ian Clark
- Reputational damage. Public libraries are seen as some of the most trustworthy institutions in the country and tieing in with companies with poorer reputations (e.g. banks, fast food outlets) damages that reputation.
- Commercial partnering is about currying political favour with the government. Libraries should be above this and, indeed, stand against the current political views which have resulted in the cutting of library budgets and the closing of hundreds of libraries.
- The socialist view is that private companies are, by their very nature, suspect and should not be welcomed in to the public sphere. Holders of this view would likely be against any such partnering or investment at all, regardless of the benefit to the service.
- Gives the possibility of negative headlines.
- One of the unique selling points of public libraries is the absence of commercial advertising messages: it is a space where you need not spend money and where the only sales messages are likely to be non-profits. This sanctuary on the high street will be lost if there is too much commercial involvement.”
- Private companies have an ulterior motive in helping public libraries. For examples, Barclays may be directing those learning how to use IT to sites which are favourable to the bank.
- We are devaluing libraries by saying we cannot do certain things: librarians are information professionals who should provide the IT support themselves. “We know this stuff. We know this stuff better than Barclays do. “
- In practice, it would be difficult to withdraw from partnering deals without suffering reputational damage, even if such schemes are proven to be detrimental. If the SCL or Task Force are closely associated with a project, with political backing, then walking away from it may rebound.
- Carnegie was a philanthropist, not investing in libraries for profit. Comparing his investment with that of the Halifax therefore does not stand. While on this theme, while it is true that the US does indeed gain more funding for public libraries through philanthropy, this is not the same as for-profits. Such philanthropy (e.g. the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) is non-profit and is not normally intended to directly benefit the private company, In contrast, Halifax and Barclays are for-profit and are doing the work for gain, albeit probably for reputational reasons than the simple bottom line.
Further reading
- Please note that this page does not include arguments for or against private companies taking over the wholescale running of public libraries: that subject is covered in the following pages: for, against and overview. There are also special pages on LSSI and Carillion, as well as a 2011 article reviewing all the information then available here.
- Income generation for public libraries – Locality.
- Roads and Fences: the Myth of Public Library Neutrality – Open Shelf.
- Public libraries: Bourgeois nostalgia and the myth of neutrality – David Percival
- Barclays and the library marketing opportunity – Infoism.
- Digital Skills Partnerships in Libraries – Libraries Taskforce / Gov.uk.
- Public Libraries Corner: Commercial Partnerships in the Public Library – Ariadne
January, 2016
No comments yet.
Subscribe
Contact
Please send any news, comment or thoughts to ianlibrarian@live.co.uk.Recent Comments
- Dave - Libraries Hacked on Aberdeen getting worse but otherwise we’re getting Beta
- Erwin Lagustan on Ideas and innovations in public libraries
- Jeanette Jones on The joy of work
- Barbara Carol Band on No words
- Sue Wickstead on A warm Christmas
Thank you
Warren O'Donoghue of Rabbitdigital Design has been wonderful in designing and creating this website, maintaining it and basically being there for the one hundred and one web problems that seem to surface all the time.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
-
Top Posts & Pages
- Some folk can't be satisfied
- A little bit optimistic
- By authority
- Lego in libraries
- The CCC/Tsutaya library miracle in Japan: combined bookshop libraries
- Libraries with music practice rooms
- Literature Festivals with library involvement
- Statistics
- Ideas and innovations in public libraries
- Arguments against libraries, arguments for libraries

